Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Learn Dev. 2016 Mar 8;12(3):338–356. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2015.1117977

Table 4.

Results of t-tests for difference scores in the kinematic analysis and transcription analysis.

T-tests for the difference scores in the kinematic and transcription analyses
Kinematic Analysis Transcription Analysis
Condition
High neighborhood density
High phonotactic probability
 Word t(15)=1.915, p=.07* t(15)=2.765, p=.01**
 Non-word t(15)=1.319, p=.21 t(15)=422, p=.68

High neighborhood density
Low phonotactic probability
 Word t(15)=.150, p=.88 t(15)=975, p=.35
 Non-word t(15)=1.097, p=.29 t(15)=919, p=.37

Low neighborhood density
High phonotactic probability
 Word t(15)=2.104, p=.05* t(15)=-.745, p=.47
 Non-word t(15)=1.271, p=.22 t(15)=-.877, p=.39

Low neighborhood density
Low phonotactic probability
 Word t(15)=3.3032, p=.008** t(15)=-.522, p=.61
 Non-word t(15)=.391, p=.7 t(15)=000, p=1.0