Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 25;4:5838. doi: 10.1038/srep05838

Figure 1. ChR2 current during a light-triggered action potential is different from the ChR2 current in response to a constant voltage clamp using the same light pulse parameters (here 470 nm, 1 mW/mm2).

Figure 1

(a–b). The response of a ventricular cardiomyocyte to a 5 ms light pulse. (c–d). The response of a ventricular cardiomyocyte to a 100 ms light pulse. (e–f). The response of a squid giant axon to a 5 ms light pulse. Panels a, c and e show the lighttriggered APs, while (b), (d) and (f) show IChR2(AP). For comparison, IIChR2(Vclamp) in response to identical light pulses is overlaid (grey) in (b), (d) and (f) (Vclamp5285 mV or 260 mV). Cardiomyocyte simulations (a–d) were at 37°C, while the squid giant axon model (e–f) was run at 6.3°C. Blue bars indicate timing of light pulse application.