Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 6;11(6):e0157112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157112

Table 1. Evaluation of mAP performance with different R (mean ± std %).

R 0 8 16 24 32
mAP 84.01±1.68 86.31±1.74 87.74±1.46 88.33±1.36 87.88±0.97