Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 6;11(6):e0157112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157112

Table 2. Evaluation of mAP performance with different N (mean ± std %).

N 1 2 4 8 16
mAP 88.33±1.36 90.27±0.99 92.38±0.78 93.50±0.53 94.01±0.46