Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 7;7:802. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00802

Table 3.

Pearson correlation coefficients among TN, H, FW, TD, NI, LI, LF, WF, LL, WL, and DW§ in M. sinensis population.

TN H FW TD NI LI LF WF LL WL DW
TN 1
H −0.028 1
FW 0.610** 0.408** 1
TD −0.185* 0.204* 0.364** 1
NI −0.030 0.391** 0.285** 0.218* 1
LI −0.011 0.522** 0.223** 0.002 0.301** 1
LF −0.125 0.246** 0.042 0.095 −0.131 0.062 1
WF −0.138 0.283** 0.110 0.229** 0.117 0.181* 0.525** 1
LL −0.136 0.380** 0.264** 0.386** 0.085 0.212* 0.427** 0.208* 1
WL −0.287** 0.331** 0.285** 0.527** 0.360** 0.195* 0.053 0.406** 0.360** 1
DW 0.527** 0.392** 0.897** 0.334** 0.386** 0.251** −0.006 0.131 0.170* 0.364** 1
§

TN, tiller number; H, plant height; FW, fresh biomass yield each plant; TD, the main tiller diameter; NI, the number of main stem internode; LI, the length of main internode; LF, the length of flag leaf; WF, the width of flag leaf; LL, the length of longest leaf; WL, the width of longest leaf; and DW, dry biomass yield each plant.

Correlation calculated using mean of 3 years.

*

Correlation is significant at P < 0.05.

**

Correlation is significant at P < 0.01.