Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 7;3(3):ENEURO.0094-16.2016. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0094-16.2016

Table 1:

Two-way ANOVA parameters for comparison among groups: cells from diestrus vs proestrus mice

Parameter (figure) Estrous cycle stage Antagonists Interaction
Extracellular recordings
Firing frequency (Fig. 1C) F(1,42) = 37.3*** F(1,42) = 3.0 F(1,42) = 1.2
Bursts/5min (Fig. 1D) F(1,46) = 14.8*** F(1,46) = 8.4** F(1,46) = 0.8
Whole-cell recordings
Input resistance (Fig. 2D) F(1,47) = 2.3 F(1,47) = 7.5**a F(1,47) = 4.2*
Input resistance (Fig. 2C) F(1,37) = 1.7 F(1,37) = 6.7*b F(1,37) = 1.2
Rebound: initial IF (Fig.2F) F(1,30) = 69.3*** F(1,30) = 7.0*b F(1,30) = 80.3***
Rebound: overall frequency (Fig. 2G) F(1,34) = 34.8*** F(1,34) = 7.3*b F(1,34) = 32.0***
First spike latency (Fig. 3B) F(1,37) = 0.8 F(1,37) = 0.4b F(1,37) = 0.3
Rate of rise (Fig. 3C) F(1,37) = 0.6 F(1,37) = 0.7b F(1,37) = 0.01
Threshold (Fig. 3D) F(1,37) = 0.1 F(1,37) = 22.6***b F(1,37) = 3.8
FWHM (Fig. 3E) F(1,37) = 2.1 F(1,37) = 2.8b F(1,37) = 0.2
AHP amplitude (Fig. 3F) F(1,37) = 0.7 F(1,37) = 35.3***b F(1,37) = 0.1
AHP time (Fig. 3G) F(1,37) = 1.6 F(1,37) = 26.2***b F(1,37) = 0.1

aCesium antagonist.

bTonic vs DIB.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.