Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 7;7:834. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00834

Table 3.

Cognitive performance of two training groups at the 4-month follow-up.

Memory (n = 17) Combined (n = 14) P-valueb Partial eta squared
Basline Follow-up Basline Follow-up
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
TRAINED MEMORY TASKS
Face-name 3.65 1.79 6.76 2.62 2.75 1.92 4.89 2.63 0.20 0.06
Wordlist 10.06 2.59 12.59 2.79 9.14 1.56 10.43 2.87 0.17 0.06
NON-TRAINED MEMORY TASKS
ALT 10.59 3.79 15.62 4.65 10.11 2.47 14.39 3.13 0.59 0.01
LMT 9.00 2.55 10.38 2.97 8.14 2.20 9.14 2.67 0.71 0.01
MMQ 15.24 9.66 15.00 8.14 20.79 10.89 24.00 11.5 0.22 0.05
TRAINED EF TASKS
Word updating 5.47 1.70 7.47 1.94 3.57 2.21 7.00 2.83 0.11 0.09
Picture updating 7.65 1.80 8.47 1.66 6.07 1.90 8.43 2.31 0.07 0.11
NON-TRAINED EF TAKS
TMT (B-A)a 27.00 17.51 21.12 15.50 29.07 20.44 27.36 18.30 0.52 0.01
Stroop testa 12.00 5.51 13.76 7.66 12.14 13.83 10.64 7.74 0.34 0.03
Digital span backward 5.00 1.28 5.53 1.74 4.14 1.10 4.43 1.83 0.62 0.01
OTHERS COGNITIVE TASKS
Digital span forward 7.76 1.09 7.71 1.05 7.50 1.09 7.43 1.34 0.98 0.00
TMT-Aa 32.47 6.48 26.29 8.56 36.43 8.43 27.36 6.27 0.37 0.03
Verbal fluency 49.00 8.30 53.12 11.29 44.93 8.68 48.93 9.26 0.97 0.00

SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; ALT: Associative Learning Test; LMT: Logical Memory Test; EF, executive function; TMT: Trail Making Test; MMQ, Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire.

a

Lower scores indicate better performance.

b

P-values for 2 (combined group vs. memory group) × 2 (baseline vs. follow-up) ANOVAs.