Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2016 Feb 10;91:197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.070

Table 1.

Comparison of UF parameters between successful repair and recurrence groups (ranked by ROC AUC)

Successful Repair Group
Recurrence Group
P Value ROC AUC (vs cystoscopy)
N Mean ± SD N Mean ± SD
Postoperative Qm-Qa (mL/s) 253 13.27 ± 8.19 57 7.42 ± 5.40 <.0001 0.8295
Postoperative Qm (mL/s) 265 28.05 ± 12.52 58 17.11 ± 8.31 <.0001 0.8241
ΔQm (mL/s) 157 19.88 ± 14.30 32 8.07 ± 10.57 <.0001 0.7638
Δ(Qm -Qa) (mL/s) 146 10.38 ± 9.14 31 4.23 ± 6.19 <.0001 0.7531
Postoperative Qa (mL/s) 253 14.84 ± 7.47 57 9.80 ± 4.51 <.0001 0.7289
ΔQa (mL/s) 146 9.07 ± 8.49 31 3.74 ± 6.07 <.0001 0.7004
Postoperative PVR (mL) 244 72.64 ± 105.30 54 136.67 ± 174.00   .0116 0.6296
Postoperative VV (mL) 265 398.91 ± 204.33 58 365.33 ± 205.62   .2584 0.5647

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves; PVR, postvoid residual; Qa, average flow rate; Qm, maximum flow rate; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; UF, uroflowmetry; VV, voided volume.