Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg. 2013 Aug;206(2):218–222. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.037

Table 2. Surveillance intensity – all evaluable responses for common surveillance modalities subdivided by physician specialty* (N=846).

These data show the variability in surveillance intensity among the three specialty groups (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists and surgeons) and within each group.

Modality Year Postsurgery
1 2 3 4 5
Office visit
Medical oncologist 3.5 ± 1.6 3.0 ± 1.2 2.5 ± 1.2 2.3 ± 1.3 2.2 ± 1.4
Radiation oncologist 3.1 ± 1.4 2.7 ± 1.1 2.5 ± 1.5 2.2 ± 1.5 2.1 ± 1.5
Surgical oncologist 3.0 ± 1.7 2.6 ± 1.3 2.2 ± 1.2 1.9 ± 1.2 1.9 ± 1.2
P value <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.02 <0.002 <0.02

Mammogram
Medical oncologist 1.6 ± 1.6 1.5 ± 1.8 1.4 ± 1.9 1.3 ± 1.9 1.3 ± 2.0
Radiation oncologist 1.7 ± 0.9 1.4 ± 0.9 1.2 ± 1.3 1.2 ± 1.3 1.2 ± 1.3
Surgical oncologist 1.4 ± 0.6 1.3 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.4 1.0 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.2
P value 0.399 0.336 0.195 0.090 0.098

Liver function tests
Medical oncologist 2.3 ± 2.1 1.9 ± 1.8 1.7 ± 1.7 1.6 ± 1.7 1.5 ± 1.7
Radiation oncologist 1.4 ± 1.8 1.1 ± 1.3 1.0 ± 1.3 0.9 ± 1.1 0.9 ± 1.1
Surgical oncologist 1.0 ± 1.3 0.9 ± 1.2 0.8 ± 1.0 0.7 ± 0.9 0.7 ± 1.0
P value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
*

The number in each cell is the number of times a particular modality is recommended in a particular posttreatment year, displayed as mean ± SD. This depiction of the data gives a conservative impression of the variation in practices.

NS = not significant