Table 10.
Structure | Model‐based | Group‐wise | MAGeT Brain | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANIMAL | ANTs | ANIMAL | ANTs | ANIMAL | ANTs | |
Kappa | ||||||
Mouse | ||||||
Hippocampus | 0.863 (0.850–0.881) | 0.847 (0.829–0.864) | 0.816 (0.797–0.836) | 0.833 (0.813–0.849) | 0.869## (0.853–0.884) | 0.850### (0.832–0.867) |
Anterior commissure | 0.752 (0.732–0.772) | 0.751 (0.734–0.766) | 0.692 (0.672–0.710) | 0.728 (0.708–0.750) | 0.801***,### (0.790–0.811) | 0.759### (0.742–0.775) |
Human | ||||||
Striatum | 0.818 (0.808–0.827) | 0.816 (0.809–0.823) | 0.796 (0.787–0.804) | 0.807 (0.799–0.815) | 0.833**,### (0.825–0.837) | 0.845***,### (0.833–0.843) |
Globus pallidus | 0.735 (0.712–0.752) | 0.740 (0.722–0.759) | 0.722 (0.697–0.746) | 0.728 (0.702–0.753) | 0.743 (0.723–0.762) | 0.752# (0.733–0.771) |
Thalamus | 0.850 (0.838–0.856) | 0.848 (0.840–0.856) | 0.843 (0.833–0.854) | 0.849 (0.837–0.860) | 0.861# (0.881–0.900) | 0.856 (0.850–0.864) |
Jaccard | ||||||
Mouse | ||||||
Hippocampus | 0.768 (0.740–0.789) | 0.735 (0.708–0.762) | 0.691 (0.671–0.710) | 0.712 (0.686–0.738) | 0.768## (0.745–0.792) | 0.740### (0.713–0.767) |
Anterior commissure | 0.603 (0.578–0.629) | 0.601 (0.581–0.623) | 0.529 (0.507–0.550) | 0.574 (0.546–0.599) | 0.661***,### (0.653–0.683) | 0.611### (0.591–0.632) |
Human | ||||||
Striatum | 0.692 (0.683–0.702) | 0.690 (0.680–0.700) | 0.661 (0.649–0.673) | 0.740 (0.732–0.748) | 0.710**,### (0.702–0.719) | 0.740***,### (0.732–0.748) |
Globus pallidus | 0.581 (0.557–0.606) | 0.591 (0.569–0.614) | 0.568 (0.538–0.597) | 0.610 (0.582–0.631) | 0.585 (0.570–0.620) | 0.610# (0.582–0.631) |
Thalamus | 0.735 (0.723–0.749) | 0.738 (0.725–0.748) | 0.730 (0.714–0.745) | 0.731 (0.718–0.740) | 0.751# (0.740–0.766) | 0.741 (0.738–0.760) |
*,**, and *** represent significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 for MAGeT Brain as compared to its Model‐based counterpart.
#, ##, and, ### represent significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 for MAGeT Brain as compared to its group‐wise counterpart.
Only segmentations using the same nonlinear registration algorithms were compared to one another (e.g., only the model‐based segmentation using ANIMAL) was compared to the MAGeT Brain segmentation using ANIMAL.