Skip to main content
. 2012 May 19;34(10):2635–2654. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22092

Table 10.

Results for model‐based, group‐wise and MAGeT Brain segmentations using atlases given as mean (confidence interval)

Structure Model‐based Group‐wise MAGeT Brain
ANIMAL ANTs ANIMAL ANTs ANIMAL ANTs
Kappa
Mouse
Hippocampus 0.863 (0.850–0.881) 0.847 (0.829–0.864) 0.816 (0.797–0.836) 0.833 (0.813–0.849) 0.869## (0.853–0.884) 0.850### (0.832–0.867)
Anterior commissure 0.752 (0.732–0.772) 0.751 (0.734–0.766) 0.692 (0.672–0.710) 0.728 (0.708–0.750) 0.801***,### (0.790–0.811) 0.759### (0.742–0.775)
Human
Striatum 0.818 (0.808–0.827) 0.816 (0.809–0.823) 0.796 (0.787–0.804) 0.807 (0.799–0.815) 0.833**,### (0.825–0.837) 0.845***,### (0.833–0.843)
Globus pallidus 0.735 (0.712–0.752) 0.740 (0.722–0.759) 0.722 (0.697–0.746) 0.728 (0.702–0.753) 0.743 (0.723–0.762) 0.752# (0.733–0.771)
Thalamus 0.850 (0.838–0.856) 0.848 (0.840–0.856) 0.843 (0.833–0.854) 0.849 (0.837–0.860) 0.861# (0.881–0.900) 0.856 (0.850–0.864)
Jaccard
Mouse
Hippocampus 0.768 (0.740–0.789) 0.735 (0.708–0.762) 0.691 (0.671–0.710) 0.712 (0.686–0.738) 0.768## (0.745–0.792) 0.740### (0.713–0.767)
Anterior commissure 0.603 (0.578–0.629) 0.601 (0.581–0.623) 0.529 (0.507–0.550) 0.574 (0.546–0.599) 0.661***,### (0.653–0.683) 0.611### (0.591–0.632)
Human
Striatum 0.692 (0.683–0.702) 0.690 (0.680–0.700) 0.661 (0.649–0.673) 0.740 (0.732–0.748) 0.710**,### (0.702–0.719) 0.740***,### (0.732–0.748)
Globus pallidus 0.581 (0.557–0.606) 0.591 (0.569–0.614) 0.568 (0.538–0.597) 0.610 (0.582–0.631) 0.585 (0.570–0.620) 0.610# (0.582–0.631)
Thalamus 0.735 (0.723–0.749) 0.738 (0.725–0.748) 0.730 (0.714–0.745) 0.731 (0.718–0.740) 0.751# (0.740–0.766) 0.741 (0.738–0.760)

*,**, and *** represent significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 for MAGeT Brain as compared to its Model‐based counterpart.

#, ##, and, ### represent significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 for MAGeT Brain as compared to its group‐wise counterpart.

Only segmentations using the same nonlinear registration algorithms were compared to one another (e.g., only the model‐based segmentation using ANIMAL) was compared to the MAGeT Brain segmentation using ANIMAL.