Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 18;18(7):1002–1010. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov303

Table 5.

Multivariate analyses of predictors for postoperative seizure controla

OR and 95% CI P
Multivariate model
 Age: 18 y–54 y vs ≥55 y 1.74 (1.18–2.58) .005
 WHO grade: I vs II/III 1.01 (0.58–1.74) .978
 Tumor location convexity: yes vs no 1.40 (0.89–2.21) .143
 Radiographic extent of resection: gross total vs incomplete 0.89 (0.55–1.45) .639
 Tumor progression: yes vs no 1.92 (1.16–3.18) .012
 Preoperative epilepsy: yes vs no 3.46 (2.32–5.16) <.001
Variables tested as additional single variablesb
 Improvement of preoperative neurologic deficits: yes vs no 0.46 (0.25–0.85) .013
 Epileptic dischargesc: yes vs no 2.52 (1.36–4.67) .003
 Edema before surgeryd: yes vs no 1.63 (1.02–2.61) .039
Surgical complications
 Sensorimotor deficits: yes vs no 1.80 (1.05–3.09) .033
 CNS infections: yes vs no 5.89 (1.53–22.61) .010
 Hydrocephalus: yes vs no 3.27 (1.35–7.95) .009
 Recraniotomy for any reason: yes vs no 2.91 (1.25–6.78) .013
 Radiographic intracranial hemorrhage: yes vs no 1.51 (0.97–2.31) .058
 Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: yes vs no 2.60 (1.17–5.76) .018

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

aN = 623 patients with complete datasets.

bFurther variables are mentioned in the text.

cPostoperative EEG recordings (N = 340).

dDocumentation available for 690 patients (CT/MRI = 629/61).