Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun;55(6):504–512.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.04.004

Table 4.

Analyses of Categorical Recurrence Rates

CATSS 5%
10%
Cotwin “Affected” Cotwin “Unaffected” Cotwin “Affected” Cotwin “Unaffected”
Male proband 28 (12) 199 (88) 40 (9) 410 (91)
Female proband 20 (21) 75 (79) 30 (15) 171 (85)
χ21 = 3.35, p = .14, OR = 0.53 [0.28/0.99] χ21 = 4.67, p = .06, OR = 0.57 [0.34/0.92]
TEDS 5%
10%
Cotwin “Affected” Cotwin “Unaffected” Cotwin “Affected” Cotwin “Unaffected”
Male proband 32 (22) 114 (78) 83 (29) 208 (71)
Female proband 21 (33) 42 (67) 52 (38) 86 (62)
χ21 = 2.46, p = .24, OR = 0.56 [0.29/1.08] χ21 = 3.23, p = .14, OR = 0.66 [0.43/1.01]
Merged Samples 5%
10%
Cotwin “Affected” Cotwin “Unaffected” Cotwin “Affected” Cotwin “Unaffected”
Male proband 60 (16) 313 (84) 163 (22) 578 (78)
Female proband 41 (26) 117 (74) 97 (29) 242 (71)
χ21 = 6.38, p < .05, OR = 0.54 [0.35/0.86] χ21 = 5.21, p < .05, OR = 0.70 [0.52/0.94]

Note: Data are shown as n (%) except where noted and in brackets, which are 95% CIs. The percentages 5% and 10% indicate which cut-off was used to select probands in each analysis (highest scoring 10% of each sample or highest scoring 5% of each sample). Merged samples are analyses of both Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden (CATSS) and Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) merged into a single dataset. OR = odds ratio.