Table 2.
Comparison of therapeutic outcomes in SPL repair.
| Parameter evaluated | Phase 1 (n = 7) | Phase 2 (n = 26) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Details of perineal repair | |||
| Experienced staff performed repair | 4 (57%) | 26 (100%) | 0.01 |
| Appropriate suture for sphincter repair | 1 (14%) | 8 (31%) | 0.64 |
| End-to-end sphincter reconstruction | 6 (86%) | 13 (50%) | 0.20 |
| Overlapping sphincter reconstruction | 1 (14%) | 8 (31%) | 0.64 |
| Therapeutic outcomes | |||
| Failure of perineal repair | 2 (29%) | 3 (12%) | 0.282 |
| Wound dehiscence/rectovaginal fistula | 1 | 2 | 0.524 |
| Sphincter disruption/faecal incontinence | 2 | 3 | 0.282 |