Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 8;6:27062. doi: 10.1038/srep27062

Table 3. Property comparison of microbial β-glucosidasesa.

Species Enzymes Optimum
Km (mM)
kcat/Km (/s/mM)
Ki (mM)
References
pH T (°C) pNPG CB pNPG CB pNPG CB
Humicola insolens Y1 HiBgl3A 5.5 60 0.90 8.44 81.6 11.1 25.0 This work
H. insolens Y1 HiBgl3B 6.0 50 1.51 28.6 55.2 This work
H. insolens Y1 HiBgl3C 5.5 55 0.20 6.63 1557 23.0 37.1 This work
Aspergillus niger N188 4.8 50 0.57 0.88 41 36 2.7 30
Aspergillus foetidus   4.8 65 0.41 8.1 31
Aspergillus japonicus   5.0 40 0.60 0.95 432 368 2.73 32
Aspergillus oryzae   5.0 50 0.29 1.96 1270 510 2.9 5 33
Fomitopsis palustris   5.0 50 0.12 4.8 6160 21 0.35 34
Hypocrea jecorina   5.0 50 0.09 0.75 466 157 0.51 32
Myceliophthora thermophila   5.0 40 0.39 2.64 376 17 0.28 35
Trichoderma reesei   4.5 50 0.54 41 0.29 36
Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum DSM 571 rBGL 6.4 70 0.63 7.9 13.3 600 37
Uncultured bacterium   6.0 40 0.39 20.4 0.65 1000 38
Neocallimastix patriciarum NpaBGS 6.0 40 39
Cow rumen metagenome LAB25g2 5.2 50 0.45 4.88 0.92 0.2 40

apNPG was used for the determination of optimal conditions, and pNPG and cellobiose (CB) were used for the determination of kinetics and glucose inhibition.