Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 6;7:11543. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11543

Figure 3. Comparison of our model to previously published psychophysical results.

Figure 3

Dots represent the empirical data, lines the model prediction. (a) Effects of lag and stimulus rate in a correspondence detection task (data from ref. 17, Experiment 1). (b) Effects of lag and stimulus rate on correspondence detection (data from ref. 17, Experiment 3). (c) Effects of temporal frequency (rate) and phase shift of periodic stimuli on synchrony detection (data from ref. 5, Experiment 1). (d) Synchrony detection for a single pulse (data from ref. 5, Experiment 1) and random sequences of pulses (temporal rate 80 Hz, data from ref. 20, Experiment 1). (e) Temporal order judgment task (data from ref. 21, Experiment 2). (f) Synchrony judgment task (data from ref. 23, Experiment 1).