Table 4.
Patients’ perceptions of the therapeutic alliance when treated by male and female chiropractors
| Patients’ perceptions | Gender chiropractor | N | Meana | SD | t(df) | p | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall WAV-12 | Male | 86 | 4.09 | ±0.60 | t(181) = −0.18 | 0.86 | 
| Female | 97 | 4.10 | ±0.59 | |||
| Goal dimension | Male | 93 | 3.98 | ±0.66 | t(195) = −0.11 | 0.92 | 
| Female | 104 | 3.99 | ±0.65 | |||
| Task dimension | Male | 96 | 4.11 | ±0.59 | t(199) = 0.19 | 0.85 | 
| Female | 105 | 4.09 | ±0.64 | |||
| Bond dimension | Male | 90 | 4.17 | ±0.74 | t(186) = −1.07 | 0.29 | 
| Female | 98 | 4.28 | ±0.66 | 
aMeasured on a 1–5 Likert scale, 5 representing an optimal alliance