Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Feb 8;130:118–128. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.02.002

Table 2.

Mean contact times (seconds) during the test phase with novel and familiar objects for Tc1, Tg2576 and WT control mice.

Genotype Mean contact times during the test stage (seconds)
Experiment 1a: Novel object recognition – 10 min vs 24 h delay

Novel object (10 min) Novel object (24 h) Familiar object (10 min) Familiar object (24 h)
Tc1 5.692 7.132 4.048 2.956
WT 6.399 7.716 2.120 2.791
Experiment 1b: Novel object recognition – 10 min vs immediate delay

Novel object (10 min) Novel object (Immediate) Familiar object (10 min) Familiar object (Immediate)
Tc1 10.910 16.863 8.647 4.083
WT 12.963 11.790 5.190 3.724
Experiment 2a: Object in place – 24 h versus immediate delay

Novel place (24 h) Novel place (Immediate) Familiar place (24 h) Familiar place (Immediate)
Tc1 9.323 9.909 3.369 3.959
WT 12.422 7.191 5.378 3.215
Experiment 2b: Object location – 10 min

Novel location (10 min) Familiar location (10 min)
Tc1 13.060 5.894
WT 19.729 4.616
Experiment 3: Novel odour recognition – 10 min vs 24 h delay

Novel odour (10 min) Novel odour (24 h) Familiar odour (10 min) Familiar odour (24 h)
Tc1 8.819 7.413 7.580 3.640
WT 7.493 7.209 2.821 3.240
Experiment 4: Yoked novel object recognition

Novel object (10 min) Novel object (24 h) Familiar object (10 min) Familiar object (24 h)
Tg2576 4.774 1.759 1.924 1.767
WT 10.543 13.698 4.499 6.244
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure