Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoporos Int. 2015 Oct 8;27(3):943–951. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3350-4

Table 3.

Description of Prospective Falls by Cognitive Status (No MCI versus MCI)

No MCI (n =64) MCI (n =255) Total (n=319) Group comparison p value1
Fall Variables Frequency (%) Frequency (%) Frequency (%)
Indoor falls 0.736
 0 35 (55) 141 (55) 176 (55)
 1 8 (13) 47 (18) 55 (17)
 2 7 (11) 20 (8) 27 (8)
 3 4 (6) 12 (5) 16 (5)
 ≥4 10 (16) 35 (14) 45 (14)
Outdoor falls 0.308
 0 46 (72) 177 (69) 223 (70)
 1 8 (13) 40 (16) 48 (15)
 2 0 (0) 12 (5) 12 (4)
 3 1 (2) 2 (1) 3 (1)
 ≥4 9 (14) 24 (9) 33 (10)
Non-injurious falls 0.994
 0 42 (66) 165 (65) 207 (65)
 1 9 (14) 38 (15) 47 (15)
 2 4 (6) 14 (5) 18 (6)
 3 1 (2) 6 (2) 7 (2)
 ≥4 8 (13) 32 (13) 40 (13)
Mild-injurious falls 0.685
 0 38 (59) 159 (62) 197 (62)
 1 11 (17) 44 (17) 44 (14)
 2 4 (6) 14 (5) 18 (6)
 3 1 (2) 11 (4) 12 (4)
 ≥4 10 (16) 27 (11) 37 (12)
Severe-injurious falls 0.201
 0 53 (83) 221 (87) 274 (86)
 1 2 (3) 11 (4) 13 (4)
 2 2 (3) 1 (0) 3 (1)
 3 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 ≥4 7 (11) 22 (9) 29 (9)
First fall-degree of injury
Non-injurious 12 (44) 52 (47) 64 (46)
Mild-injurious 13 (54) 54 (49) 67 (49)
Severe-injurious 2 (7) 5 (45) 7 (5)
First fall - location
Indoor 19 (70) 77 (69) 96 (70)
Outdoor 8 (30) 34 (31) 42 (30)
Total falls 0.757
 0 30 (47) 120 (47) 150 (47)
 1 9 (14) 52 (20) 61 (19)
 2 10 (16) 33 (13) 43 (13)
 3 4 (6) 16 (6) 20 (6)
 ≥4 11 (17) 34 (13) 45 (14)
1

The value represents the p value for the χ2 test.