Figure 4.

A visualizes both the decay rate constant ${\mu }_i$ (left panel) and the ratio ${\tau }_i^0/{\mathrm{\mu }}_i$ (right panel) neuroanatomically using top views for all four parcellation schemes on the brain surface of a representative subject. Note that visually trends are consistent across all schemes, showing both a posterior‐to‐anterior gradient and a medial‐to‐lateral gradient for ${\mu }_i$ and ${\tau }_i^0/{\mu }_i$ (the gradients are increasing for decay rate ${\mu }_i$ and decreasing for the ratio ${\tau }_i^0/{\mu }_i$). Figure 4B visualizes the embeddedness, as a heat map, on a Freesurfer‐defined group average cortical surface using the 82‐parcellation scheme.