Table 4.

Prediction of unprotected sex from each measure of potential coercion, controlling for demographics, economic factors, relationship attributes, intervention status, and (in the panel data) wave

	Outcome: unprotected sex
	Wave 1 (n = 715)		Wave 2 (n = 607)		Wave 3 (n = 605)		Panel data (n = 1927)
Predictor	IRR (95 % CI)	p	IRR (95 % CI)	p	IRR (95 % CI)	p	IRR (95 % CI)	p
Live with boyfriend (minors)	1.76 (1.26, 2.46)	***	1.98 (1.20, 3.27)	**	2.09 (0.93, 4.69)	+	1.93 (1.23, 3.03)	**
Boyfriend who physically abuses	1.32 (1.04, 1.68)	*	1.84 (1.37, 2.47)	****	1.74 (1.28, 2.35)	****	1.55 (1.21, 2.00)	***
Live with boyfriend	1.41 (1.18, 1.68)	****	1.44 (1.15, 1.81)	**	1.80 (1.42, 2.28)	****	1.48 (1.22, 1.81)	****
Boyfriend who emotionally abuses	1.26 (1.03, 1.55)	*	1.42 (1.05, 1.93)	*	1.35 (0.97, 1.87)	+	1.31 (1.06, 1.63)	*
Boyfriend primary source of spending money	1.18 (1.00, 1.40)	*	1.21 (0.97, 1.51)	+	1.12 (0.86, 1.46)		1.18 (1.00, 1.39)	*
Age difference >4 years	1.00 (0.81, 1.24)		1.04 (0.83, 1.30)		1.16 (0.91, 1.46)		1.11 (0.95, 1.30)
Boyfriend with job	1.20 (0.99, 1.44)	+	0.92 (0.73, 1.17)		0.89 (0.68, 1.16)		1.04 (0.87, 1.24)
Boyfriend with car	1.09 (0.93, 1.30)		0.97 (0.78, 1.20)		0.86 (0.67, 1.09)		0.99 (0.84, 1.16)
Boyfriend who makes more money	1.17 (0.98, 1.38)	+	0.88 (0.71, 1.10)		0.82 (0.65, 1.05)		0.97 (0.83, 1.14)

The table is sorted in order of the incidence risk ratios from the panel data. Regressions for emotional and physical abuse were limited to respondents over 18 due to mandatory reporting requirements: n = 385, 366, and 419 at waves 1, 2, and 3, and n = 1170 within 512 observations in the panel data. Regressions for cohabitation among minors were limited to respondents under 18 at the time of the survey, n = 327, 229, and 159 at the three waves, and n = 714 within 328 observations in the panel data

+p ≤ 0.1; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p ≤ 0.0001