Skip to main content
. 2016 May 20;5(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2252-z

Table 1.

Herbert’s hypothesis—differences between 1986 and 1994 models

Analyte Model Deficiency stage
1 2 3 4
1986 Normal Negative B12 balance B12 depletion B12-deficient erythropoiesis B12-deficiency anaemia
1994 Normal Early negative B12 balance B12 depletion Damaged metabolism: B12-deficient erythropoiesis Clinical damage: B12-deficiency anemia
HoloTC (pmol/L) 1986 >22 <15 <15 <9 <9
HoloTC (pmol/L) 1994 >37 <30 <30 <30 <30
TC saturation (%) 1986 >5 <5 <2 <1 <1
TC saturation (%) 1994 >5 <4 <4 <4 <4
HoloHC (pmol/L) 1986 >111 >111 <111 <74 <74
HoloHC (pmol/L) 1994 >133 >133 <111 <74 <74
MMA high 1986 No No No ? Yes
MMA high 1994 No No No ? Yes
tHcy high 1986
tHcy high 1994 No No No Yes Yes

Data in this table was derived from Herbert (1987, 1994)

HoloTC concentration converted from pg/mL to pmol/L, using formula from Herbert (1987): HoloTC (pmol/L) = HoloTC (pg/mL) × 0.74

Two stages preceding “Normal”, added by Herbert in the 1994 model, omitted from this table