Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 28;21(4):399–406. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.02.002

Table 2.

Selected series of vestibular schwannoma comparing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT).

Author Year Institution N. of pts Median follow-up (months) Median Dose Mean/Median volume (cc) Local control Hearing preservation Toxicity
VII n.c. V n.c. Others
SRS vs. FSRT
Collen25 2011 Brussels, Belgium 78 56 SRS 12.5 Gy 1.7 95% 82% 4 y 16% 6% 5% hydrocephalus
41 73 FSRT
50 Gy, 25 fxs
40–30 Gy, 10 fxs
6.3 59% 4 y 3% 3%



Kopp24 2011 Munich, Germany 68 30 SRS 12 Gy 1.24 98.5% 85% 4.4% 13% NA
47 32 FSRT 54 Gy, 30 fxs 5.7 97.9% 79% 2.1% 4.2% NA



Puataweepong26 2013 Bangkok, Thailand 39 61 SRS 12 Gy 0.9 95% 5 y 75% 5 y <1% 0% <1% hydrocephalus
79 61 FSRT
25 Gy (range, 18–30), 5 fxs (range, 3–10)
3.9 100% 5 y 87% 5 y <1% 0% <1% hydrocephalus
28 45–50 Gy, 20–25 fxs 9.5 95% 5 y 63% 5 y



Anderson27 2014 Wisconsin, USA 48 83.6 SRS 12.5 Gy 0.66 97% 5 y
85% 10 y
60% 2.1% 5 y 10.5% 5 y 2.2% tinnitus
19 53.6 FSRT
45–50.4 Gy, 25–28 fxs
2.94 100% 5 y 44.4% 0% 5.3% 5.6% vertigo
0% tinnitus
37 43.1 20 Gy, 5 fxs, once a week 0.89 90.5% 5 y 63.2% 2.1% 20.5% 2.9% vertigo
2.9% tinnitus



Combs28 2015 3 centres, Germany 158 67 SRS 13 Gy 1 95% 5 y
94% 10 y
86% < 1% 1.8% 3% gait uncertainty
291 67 FSRT 57.6 Gy, 32 fxs 3.5 95% 5 y
94% 10 y
84% 1% 14%

SRS, radiosurgery (marginal dose); FSRT, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy; y, years; NA, not available.