Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 16;21(4):336–355. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.03.007

Table 2.

Results of the main series of meningioma treated with photon radiation therapy.

Author Year of publication N. pts Technique Dose and fractionation Mean FU (months) Outcome Toxicity Comments and authors conclusion
Aicholzer et al.22 2000 46 Gamma knife 9–25 Gy margin dose in single fraction 48 LC 96% Minimal toxicity:
1 case (2%) of transient paresis,
1 case (2%) of hypopituitarism
No difference in outcome in post operative vs. radical treatment
Zachenhofer et al.23 2006 36 Gamma knife 9–25 Gy margin dose in single fraction 103 LC 94% 1 abducens nerve palsy,
1 focal seizure,
1 hypopituitarims
(8% developed toxicity)
Subset of Aicholzer's series with longer follow-up, confirms same findings
Metellus et al.24 2005 74 3D-CRT
(38 patients)
Gamma knife
(36 patients)
50–55 Gy
(1.6–2 Gy/fr) for 3D-CRT;
6–25 Gy in single fraction prescription 30–70% isodose
91 (median) for 3D-CRT (extrapolated from graph);
80 (median) for GK (extrapolated from graph)
LC 97.4% for 3D-CRT;
LC 94.4% for GK
No significant toxicity in 3D-CRT group,
1 transient stroke in GK group
Pts treated with GK had smaller tumours, there was no apparent difference in outcome between the two modalities
Kreil et al.25 2005 200 Gamma knife 7–25 Gy in single fraction prescription 20–80% isodose 95 (median) Actuarial
5y LC 98.5% 10y LC 97.2%
1 pt (0.5%) with worsening cranial nerve symptoms SRS may replace surgery in selected cases
Han et al.26 2008 63 Gamma knife 7–20 Gy margin dose in single fraction 77 LC 94% 2 pts (2%) had recurrent seizures,
10 pts (16%) had worsening of cranial nerves symptoms
SRT can be an alternative to surgery, toxicity is acceptable but not negligible
Igaki et al.27 2009 98 Gamma knife 14–18 Gy in single fraction prescription 40–50% isodose 53 (median) Actuarial
5y LC 87% 10y LC 79%
4 pts (4%) with worsening of cranial nerve symptoms Tumour volume smaller than 4 cc and complete target coverage were associated with better LC
Nakaya et al.28 2010 44 Gamma knife 13 Gy margin dose in single fraction 60 (median) LC 100% 1 pt (worsening of neurological deficit) SRT can be an alternative to surgery. All tumours caused brainstem compression
Pollock et al.29 2012 251 Gamma knife Mean margin dose 15.8 ± 2 Gy 62.9 98.8% Toxicity in 23 patients (9.2%): cranial nerves deficit 15 pts, headache 5 pts, hemiparesis 5 pts, seizure 4 pts, cyst formation 1 pts, stroke 1 pts Long follow up is needed, local recurrence were observed after more than 10 years
Chuang et al.30 2004 43 LINAC SRT 7–25 Gy in single fraction prescription 80% isodose 74.5 (median) Actuarial
7y LC 89.7%
2 pts (4.7%) with toxicity (actuarial 7y LC 89.7%) No difference in outcome in post operative vs. radical treatment
Selch et al.31 2004 45 LINAC SRT 42.5–54 Gy
(2 Gy/fr), 90% isodose
36 (median) 98% 1 cerebrovascular event All tumours were in the cavernous sinus
Correa et al.32 2014 89 LINAC SRS (single fraction), or fSRT fSRT: 45–50 Gy in (1.8–2 Gy/fr);
SRS 13–15 Gy at 80–90% isodose
73 (median) Actuarial
5y, 10y and 15y DFS: 98.8%, 92.3%, 92.3%
No sever toxicity, only transient events All tumours were in the cavernous sinus, larger lesion and lesion close to optic pathways were treated with SRT. There was no difference in outcome between SRS and SRT
Kaul et al.33 2014 136 LINAC fSRT 32.4–63 Gy
(1.8–2 Gy/fr)
44.9 (median) Actuarial
5y PFS: 93.8%,
10y PFS 91.5%
37.5% of the patients showed grade I or II late fatigue or headache Fractionated SRT is used for tumours close to OAR, there may be a relevant selection bias when comparing with SRS
Soldà et al.34 2013 145 LINAC fSRT 50–55 Gy
(1.5–1.66 Gy/fr)
43 (median) Actuarial
5y LC 93% 10y LC 86%
8 pts (3.5%) worsening vision, 1 pt (0.5%) trigeminal neuralgia, 2 pts (1%) cognitive
impairment, 2 pts (1%) cerebrovascular accidents
Selection bias may hinder retrospective series comparison with different techniques
Tanzler et al.35 2011 103 3D-CRTor IMRT or fSRT 50.4–55.8 Gy
(1.86 Gy/fr)
88 (median) Actuarial
5y LC 96% 10y LC 95%
10 pts (7%) had significant toxicity:
- 2 pts developed brain necrosis and 1 pt died of it,
- 2 pts developed bilateral optic neuropathy and blindness,
- 1 pt developed unilateral retinopathy an impaired vision
- 1 pt developed cataract,
- 1 pt developed hydrocephalus and necessitated a shunt,
- 1 pt developed osteomyielitis of ear canal and required surgical debridement,
- 1 pt died of steroid therapy complications
All tumours where WHO grade I. There was no difference in outcome between post operative and definitive RT. Fractionated SRT is a treatment option for patients not candidate to radical surgery or SRS
Litré et al.36 2009 100 LINAC fSRT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fr) 33 Actuarial
7y LC 94%
Toxicity in 23 patients(9.2%): cranial nerves deficit 15 pts, headache 5 pts, hemiparesis 5 pts, seizure 4 pts, cyst formation 1 pt, stroke 1 pt All tumours where in the cavernous sinus, fractionated SRT is the first option for meningioma in the cavernous sinus
Hamm et al.37 2008 224 LINAC fSRT/SRS fSRT: 60 Gy
(1.8–2 Gy/fr);
SRS single fraction of 4–5 Gy
36 (median) Actuarial 5YPFS 96.9% Late grade III toxicity 2.7% Radiotherapy may be an alternative to surgery, for large tumours or tumours close to critical structures fractionated RT may be beneficial
Combs et al.38 2013 507 IMRT/fSRT with LINAC or tomotherapy 25–68 Gy
(1.6–5 Gy/fr)
107 (median) Actuarial 5y LC 95%
10y LC 88%
QOL was decreased due to disease or therapy only in 8 patients (3%). S Atypical and anaplastic histologies had significantly worse outcome (10YLC 53%). Small lesions may be treated with SRS, lesion close to critical organ may benefit from fSRT, complex shape lesion may benefit from IMRT. The choice between wait and see, surgery or RT should be made in a multidisciplinary setting
Milker-Zabel et al.13 2007 94 IMRT 50.4–62 Gy
(1.8 Gy/fr)
53 (median) 93.6% 4.3% of the pts had worsening of neurological symptoms IMRT can be useful in complex shaped tumours
Minniti et al.39 2011 52 LINAC fSRT 50 Gy (1.66 Gy/fr) 42 (median) Actuarial 5y LC 93% 10 pts (19%) developed hypopituitarism, 1 pt had neurocognitive impairment and 1 pt had increase in seizure frequency fSRT is an acceptable technique
Colombo et al.40 2009 199 Cyberknife 11–25 Gy in 3–5 fr at 70–90% isodose 30 96.5% Worsening cranial nerve deficit in 0.5% of the pts Cyberknife allowed treatment of pts not candidate to SRS
Choi et al.41 2010 25 Cyberknife 16–30 Gy in 1–4 fr to 62–91% isodose 28 (median) Actuarial 3y LC 74% 1 pt with brain necrosis,
1 pt with hydrocephalus
All pts were WHO grade II, post op irradiation may be beneficial in these subset, SRT may be an alternative to surgery
Oermann et al.42 2013 38 Cyberknife 25– 35 Gy in 5 fraction 20 (median) 100% Only transient toxicity Fractionation may be beneficial for large lesions
Starke et al.43 2012 225 Gamma knife 8–30 Gy in single fraction at 28–80% isodose 78 (median) LC at last FU 86%; actuarial 5y LC 96% 10y LC 79% 25 pts (10%) had worsening of neurological symptoms SRS is useful for tumours in critical sites
Pourel et al.44 2001 28 skull base pts out of 45 meningioma 3D-CRT 50–70 Gy
(1.8–2 Gy/fr)
30 (median) Actuarial 5yPFS 75%; 8y PFS 67%, results reported for the whole series (45 pts) 1 case of hemiparesis, trigeminal neuralgia, and decline of cognitive function, Series include exclusive RT, post op RT and salvage RT
Jalali et al.45 2002 41 LINAC fSRT 50–55 Gy in 30–33 fractions 21 (median) 100% 2 cases of hypopituarism, 2 cases of worsening neurocognitive impairment, 1 case of worsening visual field deficit fSRT is alternative to surgery for tumours difficult to resect
Torres et al.46 2003 128 LINAC SRT or SRS SRS 12–22.85 Gy peripheral dose, SRST 23.8–54 Gy in 5–30 fractions 32.5 94.8% (SRS 92% SRT 97.2%) 5 pts had worsening of pre-existing symptoms Difference between SRS and SRT are likely due to bias in length of follow up and imaging quality, results were much worse (tumour control at last FU 38.1% in atypical tumours)
Henzel et al.47 2006 84 LINAC fSRT 50.4–60 Gy
(1.8–2 Gy/fr)
30 (median) 100% Not reported Only WHO grade I, volume shrinkage depends on initial tumour volume and age, young (<56 years) patient with small tumours showed more tumour regression
Brell et al.48 2006 30 LINAC fSRT 50–56 Gy
(2 Gy/fr)
50 (median) Actuarial 4YLPFS 93% 1 pt with neuropsychological deficit and seizure, 1 pts with short term memory loss and dysphasia All tumours in cavernous sinus
Kondziolka et al.49 2008 563 skull base pts out of 972 reported meningiomas Gamma knife 14 Gy mean peripheral dose 48 (median) WHO I 93%
WHO II 50%
WHO III 17% (both skull base and non skull base data)
15-Year actuarial complication rates 9.1%: hydrocephalus 0.4%, cranial nerve deficit 3.4%, headaches 2.2%, seizures 2.4%, motor deficit 1.4%, sensory deficit 0.3% (non skull base pts included) SRS can be used for recurrent meningioma or as first line treatment
Kollová et al.50 2007 368 Gamma knife 6.5–24 Gy margin dose in single fraction at isodose 40–90% 60 (median) Actuarial 5y LC 97.9% Permanent morbidity in 5.7% of the patients Marginal dose of less than 12–16 Gy is associated with worse local control
Hasegawa et al.51 2007 115 Gamma knife 7.5–17 Gy margin dose 62 (median) Actuarial 5y LC 94%; 10y LC 92% 11 pts (12%) had worsening of pre-existing symptoms or developed new symptoms SRS is alternative to surgery in cavernous sinus meningioma
Malik et al.52 2005 277 Gamma knife 10–30 Gy to the tumour margins 44 WHOI actuarial 5y LC 87%, 8y LC 75%;
WHO II actuarial 5y LC 49%;
WHO III actuarial 5y LC 0%, gross LC 28%
1 case of worsening VII cranial nerve deficit,
3 cases of transient trigeminal pain,
3 cases of diplopia
2 cases of weakness (tumour close to motor cortex)
Tumour grade was the strongest predictor of local control
Nicolato et al.53 2002 122 Gamma knife 11–22.5 Gy in single fraction at 30–65% isodose 48.9 (median) Actuarial 5y PFS 96.5% 1 case of intracranial hypertension and worsening cranial nerve deficit All tumours were in the cavernous sinus; SRS may be considered the first-choice treatment modality cavernous sinus meningioma
Roche et al.54 2000 92 Gamma knife 6–25 Gy at isodose of 30%-70% 30.5 (median) Actuarial 5y-PFS 92.8% 1 case of worsening trigeminal neuralgia, 1 case of complex partial seizures and 1 case of transient carotid occlusion Gamma knife can be alternative to surgery for meningioma of the cavernous sinus
Villavicencio et al.55 2001 56 LINAC SRS 9–18.5 Gy margin dose in single fraction 26 (median) 95% 5 pts (9%) had permanent late toxicity: 1 difficulty in gait, 2 visual field deficit, 2 cerebral oedema SRS is indicated both in adjuvant setting and as first line for poor surgical candidates
Friedman et al.56 2005 210 LINAC SRS 10–20 Gy in single fraction at 70–80% isodose 24 (minimum) Actuarial 5y LC WHO I 96%, WHO II 77% WHO III 19% 5 pts (2.3%) permanent toxicity, all in WHO III tumours LINAC SRS is an optimal treatment for WHO I meningiomas
Stafford et al.57 2001 147 skull base cases out of 190 meningiomas Gamma knife 12–36 Gy in single fraction at 50% isodose 47 (median) Actuarial 5y LC WHOI 93%, WHO II 68% WHO III 0% 24 pts (13%) had permanent late toxicity: 15 cranial nerve deficit, 5 symptomatic MR detectable parenchyma change, 2 carotid stenosis, 2 cystic lesion SRS can be used in the treatment of meningioma; grade II and III tumours have worse outcome

LC = local control (LC as freedom form tumour progression at last FU); FU = follow up; pt/pts = patient/patients; GK = gamma knife; SRT = stereotactic radiotherapy; fSRT = fractionated SRS; SRS = radiosurgery; fr = fraction; PFS = progression free survival; OAR = organ at risk; DFS = disease free survival.