Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 9;10:258. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00258

Table 2.

Mean (± SEM) raw values for neurophysiological variables for both limbs in the sham-tDCS and real-tDCS groups for baseline (week 0), immediately post (week 3) and follow-up (week 6).

Limb Group Time MAS score MEP amplitude (% MMAX) CSP (ms) SICI (% test stimuli)
Non-paretic
Real Baseline NA 28.0 ± 7.6 124 ± 16.3 64.0 ± 6.3
Post 20.4 ± 3.4 163 ± 8.7*# 55.3 ± 5.3
FU 26.1 ± 5.5 152 ± 13.5* 50.2 ± 6.9*#
Sham Baseline NA 34.6 ± 6.9 125 ± 17.7 53.2 ± 10.5
Post 28.2 ± 6.0 128 ± 15.5 52.8 ± 7.1
FU 29.7 ± 5.9 132 ± 17.2 52.3 ± 7.0
Paretic
Real Baseline 6 ± 1.3 6.3 ± 1.4 NA 83.9 ± 9.1
Post 10 ± 1.4* 10.4 ± 2.8* 72.4 ± 4.4
FU 10 ± 1.5*# 9.0 ± 2.1* 71.7 ± 6.7
Sham Baseline 6 ± 1.9 14.6 ± 2.3 NA 78.6 ± 11.1
Post 9 ± 2.3* 16.3 ± 2.4 75.4 ± 8.5
FU 8 ± 2.2 15.5 ± 1.8 72.4 ± 8.6

CSP, cortical silent period; FU, follow-up; MAS, motor assessment scale; MEP, motor evoked potential; MMAX, maximal M-wave; NA, not applicable/measured; SICI, short-interval intracortical inhibition. *P < 0.05 compared with baseline (within-group), #P < 0.05 compared with sham (between-group).