Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Res. 2015 Mar 11;1628(Pt A):199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.053

Table 3.

The effect of medial prefrontal cortex cTBS treatment (LTD-like) on the BOLD response to medial prefrontal cortex stimulation (MPFC). The statistical contrasts in the table include: (A) real TMS: after treatment<before treatment, (B) real TMS: after treatment>before treatment, (C) [(real TMS: after<before)- (Sham TMS: after<before)].

Cluster Statistics
MNI coordinates
Regions (including Harvard-Oxford Labels)
size p(unc) Z x y z
(A) Real cTBS: Areas with lower BOLD signal after MPFC cTBS
124 0.001 3.97 0 8 −5 Medial prefrontal cortex, cingulate, subcallosal (14%)
3.76 −9 8 −8 Left nucleus accumbens (93%)
3.55 −30 32 −17 Left orbital frontal cortex (58%)
(B) Real cTBS: Areas with higher BOLD signal after MPFC cTBS
190 0 3.88 21 −52 37 Precuneus
3.77 12 −49 52 Precuneus (52%)
3.74 33 −43 52 Superior parietal (46%)
97 0.002 3.22 57 2 28 Right dorsolateral Prefrontal, Precentral gyrus (42%)
3.18 33 17 13 Frontal operculum (49%)
3.07 48 8 16 Right inferiorfrontal gyrus (27%)
(C) Real cTBS versus sham cTBS: areas with lower BOLD signal after cTBS
128 0.001 4.07 −57 −46 −5 Left insula, middle temporal gyrus (31%)
3.97 −66 −52 1 Left middle temporal gyrus (62%)
97 0.014 3.44 −15 −19 13 Left thalamus, caudate
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure