Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 Apr 8;131:181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.03.031

Table II.

Participants’ performance on the narrative comment field between groups

Measures Samples adjusted excluding blank fields
Control
(N=105)
Treatment
(N=133)
Variation p-value
Efficiency-related
Completion time (seconds) 139.6±99.6 142.9±82.2 ↑ 2.3% 0.782
Keystrokes 144.9±110.7 104.0±86.9 ↓ 28.2% 0.002
Text generation rate (letters/second) 0.95±0.35 1.62±0.99 ↑ 70.5% 0.000
Effectiveness-related
Text length (letters) 127.9±96.6 185.1±86.4 ↑ 44.7% 0.000
Text chunks 4.1±2.5 5.4±2.5 ↑ 31.7% 0.000
Chunk length (letters) 30.3±13.1 37.7±18.6 ↑ 24.4% 0.000
Reporting comprehensiveness 3.8±2.3 5.1±2.4 ↑ 34.2% 0.000
Engagement-related
Non-adherence rate 20/125(16.0%) 2/135(1.5%) ↓ 14.5% 0.000
AS-related
Influenced chunks (N=120) - 3.8±1.9 - -
Influential rate - 66.9% - -