Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 29;87(3):280–285. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934

Table 4.

Estimates from the constrained graded response model

Item Threshold parameters Discrimination
b1 b2 b3 b4
1 −0.347 0.241 1.019 1.565 3.034
2 −0.831 −0.137 0.553 1.296 3.034
3 −0.407 0.088 0.597 1.329 3.034
4 0.270 0.638 1.148 1.952 3.034
5 −0.588 0.172 0.734 1.586 3.034
6 −1.095 −0.296 0.312 0.966 3.034
7 −0.985 −0.302 0.609 1.258 3.034
8 −1.232 −0.666 0.058 0.630 3.034
9 −0.863 −0.200 0.413 1.166 3.034
10 −0.834 −0.067 0.565 1.481 3.034
11 −1.055 −0.155 0.554 1.242 3.034
12 −0.971 −0.299 0.550 1.143 3.034