Table 5.

Regression Relationships Between Glycated Hemoglobin and Not White and Five BOLUS Calculations

					95% confidence interval
Model, variablea	F value	Adjusted R2b	β	SE	Lower	Upper	Standard coefficient (β)	t value
Model 1 (n = 76)	13.36†	0.33
Not white			0.98	0.52	−0.06	2.02	0.18	1.88‡
BOLUS			−1.51	0.26	−2.04	−0.99	−0.55	−5.74†
%Total Corrections			1.33	0.53	0.27	2.38	0.24	2.51*
Model 2 (n = 76)	13.42†	0.33
Not white			0.93	0.52	−0.11	1.98	0.17	1.78#
BOLUS			−1.94	0.34	−2.61	−1.27	−0.70	−5.75†
BOLUS × %Total Corrections			0.61	0.24	0.13	1.09	0.31	2.53*
Model 3 (n = 76)	9.94†	0.32
Not white			0.95	0.53	−0.11	2.01	0.17	1.78‡
BOLUS			−1.80	0.80	−3.39	−0.20	−0.65	−2.25*
%Total Corrections			0.45	2.37	−4.27	5.17	0.08	0.19‡
BOLUS × %Total Corrections			0.41	1.08	−1.75	2.57	0.21	0.38‡
Model 4 (n = 74)	11.18†	0.29
Not white			0.96	0.52	−0.08	1.99	0.18	1.84‡
BOLUS			−1.47	0.28	−2.01	−0.92	−0.53	−5.33†
%Meal Corrections			0.64	0.54	−0.43	1.72	0.12	1.19‡
Model 5 (n = 74)	11.32†	0.30
Not white			0.93	0.52	−0.10	1.97	0.18	1.80‡
BOLUS			−1.68	0.34	−2.36	−1.00	−0.61	−4.96†
BOLUS × %Meal Corrections			0.31	0.24	−0.16	0.79	0.16	1.31‡
Model 6 (n = 74)	8.43†	0.29
Not white			0.90	0.53	−0.15	1.95	0.17	1.71‡
BOLUS			−1.98	0.80	−3.58	−0.37	−0.71	−2.46*
%Meal Corrections			−1.03	2.53	−6.07	4.00	−0.19	−0.41‡
BOLUS × %Meal Corrections			0.76	1.12	−1.48	3.00	0.39	0.68‡

Significance (two-tailed): ^*P < 0.05, ^†P < 0.01, ^‡P > 0.05.

^aDependent variable, glycated hemoglobin.

^bAdjusted R² P value is the same as those of the corresponding model's F value.