Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun;16(6):1550–1563. doi: 10.1105/tpc.019224

Table 1.

Alterations of Circadian Period in SPY Loss-of-Function and Gain-of-Function Seedlings

Condition Genotype Period RAEa Amplitude N
Light entrainment Col 24.52 ± 0.14 0.12 ± 0.006 1.26 ± 0.12 12
spy-3 25.38b ± 0.27 0.22 ± 0.023 1.45 ± 0.12 12
Ler 24.18 ± 0.16 0.16 ± 0.010 1.25 ± 0.09 9
spy-5 25.19b ± 0.15 0.19 ± 0.020 1.25 ± 0.18 9
Col 24.54 ± 0.12 0.22 ± 0.015 0.97 ± 0.24 4
spy-4 26.21b ± 0.31 0.28 ± 0.034 1.37 ± 0.35 7
35S-SPY 22.91b ± 0.24 0.24 ± 0.012 2.3b ± 0.32 11
gi-2c 24.26 0.08 0.60
spy-4 gi-2c 27.42 0.35 0.54
gi-1c 22.29 0.12 0.90
gi-3c 21.24 0.25 0.45
gi-4c 19.44 0.09 0.38
gi-5c 19.53 0.18 0.63
gi-6c 18.66 0.17 0.43
Temperature entrainment Col 24.34 ± 0.15 0.27 ± 0.036 1.01 ± 0.18 15
spy-4 26.53b ± 0.48 0.27 ± 0.028 1.21 ± 0.12 10
35S-SPY 22.70b ± 0.39 0.19 ± 0.010 2.29b ± 0.52 4
gi-2c 25.32 0.14 0.55
gi-2 spy-4c 26.95 0.20 0.55

Seedlings were grown under entraining conditions for 5 to 7 d before being transferred to 24-well cloning plates in constant light (30 to 40 μmol s−1 m−2) and temperature (22°C) for data collection. All numbers are provided ± se.

a

Relative amplitude error.

b

Statistically different from the respective wild type by Student's t test (P < 0.01).

c

The low amplitude of these genotypes did not allow for an accurate period estimate; therefore, the circadian parameters of the average trace are given as an indication.