Table 2. Growth performance and plasma ammonia concentration1.
Histidine1 | Control | 3.7 | 5.9 | 7.9 | 9.8 | 12.2 |
IBW2 | 280.6 ± 0.84 | 279.6 ± 1.68 | 280.5 ± 0.69 | 279.1 ± 1.02 | 279.3 ± 0.67 | 279.4 ± 0.73 |
FBW2 | 511.2 ± 19.0 | 573.1 ± 8.34a | 679.3 ± 26.41a | 685.4 ± 26.3a | 612.4 ± 18.0a | 574.2 ± 6.94a |
PWG2 | 82.2 ± 7.24 | 105.0 ± 2.71a | 142.2 ± 9.69a | 145.6 ± 9.09a | 119.2 ± 5.92a | 105.6 ± 2.16a |
SGR2 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 1.28 ± 0.02a | 1.58 ± 0.07a | 1.60 ± 0.05a | 1.40 ± 0.05a | 1.29 ± 0.02a |
FI2 | 445.1 ± 5.00 | 498.5 ± 3.06a | 627.5 ± 2.15a | 602.7 ± 2.53a | 548.3 ± 1.53a | 499.7 ± 3.06a |
FE2 | 51.80 ± 3.87 | 58.89 ± 1.92a | 63.51 ± 4.44a | 67.41 ± 4.04a | 60.75 ± 3.1a | 59.01 ± 0.93a |
PER2 | 1.66 ± 0.12 | 1.89 ± 0.04a | 2.04 ± 0.14a | 2.16 ± 0.13a | 1.95 ± 0.10a | 1.89 ± 0.03a |
PAC3 | 365.3 ± 10.8 | 262.3 ± 12.9a | 176.8 ±11.2a | 153.6 ± 7.32a | 249.3 ± 11.1a | 344.2 ± 12.3a |
Regressions | ||||||
YPWG = -1.965x2 + 29.602x + 29.111 | R2 = 0.9094 | P < 0.05 | ||||
YSGR = -1.5893x2 + 1.8021x + 1.05 | R2 = 0.9209 | P < 0.05 | ||||
YFI = -5.6275x2 + 83.82x + 292.91 | R2 = 0.8800 | P < 0.05 | ||||
YFE = -0.004x2 + 0.0614x + 0.4159 | R2 = 0.9189 | P < 0.05 | ||||
YPER = -0.0129x2 + 0.1995x + 1.3212 | R2 = 0.9046 | P < 0.05 | ||||
YPAC = 7.6694x2–108.79x + 553.63 | R2 = 0.9692 | P < 0.05 |
Superscript (a) in the same row indicates a significant (P < 0.05) difference over control values.
1Upper half of the table shows different parameters of growth performance (see below) of young grass carp fed diets with graded levels of histidine (first row, g/kg). The lower half shows the regression analysis of data in the upper half of the table.
2Values are expressed as the mean ± SD, mean of three replicates with thirty fish per replicate. The mean values within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).
3Plasma ammonia concentration (PAC, μmol/L). Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6), and mean values within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).
IBW: initial body weight (g/fish); FBW: final body weight (g/fish); PWG: percentage weight gain (%); SGR: specific growth rate (%/day); FI: feed intake (g/fish); FE: feed efficiency (%); PER: protein efficiency ratio; PAC: plasma ammonia content.
Weight gain (WG) = FBW (g)–IBW (g);
PWG = 100 × WG (g)/IBW (g);
SGR = 100 × [ln FBW (g)-ln IBW (g)]/number of days;
FE = 100 × weight gain (g)/feed intake (g);
PER = wet weight gain (g)/protein intake (g);