. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0157038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157038

Table 4. Response to selection per generation (S), accuracy of the index (R_IH), and monetary overall genetic gain per generation (ΔG) for weight of 100 seeds (W100S, g), seed oil content (SOC, %) and phorbol ester concentration in seeds (PEC, mg/g) using selection index.

			S for each trait
Scenario¹	R_IH	ΔG	SOC	W100S	PEC
w1
1	0.2641	0.8647	0.37806	0.94490	-0.00377
2	0.5866	1.9206	0.42677	5.43193	-0.10412
3	0.7064	2.3128	0.36474	4.45593	0.34990
w2
1	0.3172	1.4959	0.37806	0.94490	-0.00377
2	0.5631	2.6559	0.45034	5.16525	-0.09691
3	0.6288	2.9657	0.41157	4.58196	0.26170
w3
1	0.3319	2.9980	0.37806	0.94490	-0.00377
2	0.6058	5.4716	0.44750	5.20812	-0.09802
3	0.6241	5,6372	0.43881	5.03137	0.09332

¹ In scenario 1 only SOC was used as selection criteria. W100S was incorporated into the selection index in scenario 2, and PEC was added to scenario 3. Economic relative weights (w) were defined as w1 = same, w2 = double for SOC, and w3 = 4(SOC), 2(W100S) and 1(PEC).

Table 4. Response to selection per generation (S), accuracy of the index (RIH), and monetary overall genetic gain per generation (ΔG) for weight of 100 seeds (W100S, g), seed oil content (SOC, %) and phorbol ester concentration in seeds (PEC, mg/g) using selection index.

Table 4. Response to selection per generation (S), accuracy of the index (R_IH), and monetary overall genetic gain per generation (ΔG) for weight of 100 seeds (W100S, g), seed oil content (SOC, %) and phorbol ester concentration in seeds (PEC, mg/g) using selection index.