Table 3.
Proportion of patients with both HbA1c and body weight reduction at Weeks 52 and 104
GLIM (n = 474) | CANA 100 mg (n = 478) | CANA 300 mg (n = 474) | |
---|---|---|---|
Week 52 | |||
Patients, n (%) | 127 (26.8) | 346 (72.4) | 372 (78.5) |
Difference vs GLIM (95% CI) | 45.6 (39.7, 51.5) | 51.7 (46.0, 57.3) | |
OR vs GLIM (95% CI) | 7.7 (5.7, 10.3) | 10.7 (7.9, 14.5) | |
Week 104 | |||
Patients, n (%) | 127 (26.8) | 313 (65.5) | 337 (71.1) |
Difference vs GLIM (95% CI) | 38.7 (32.6, 44.7) | 44.3 (38.4, 50.2) | |
OR vs GLIM (95% CI) | 5.6 (4.2, 7.5) | 7.4 (5.5, 9.8) |
CANA canagliflozin, CI confidence interval, GLIM glimepiride, OR odds ratio