Skip to main content
. 2016 May 27;7(2):335–348. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0175-x

Table 2.

Respondents’ most recent experiences of post-prandial hyperglycemia by diabetes type

n (%)a Type 1 (n = 187) Type 2 (n = 287) Total (n = 474)
How respondent knew episode was PPH
 Tested BG 116 (62.0) 191 (66.6) 307 (64.8)
 Just didn’t feel right 100 (53.5) 146 (50.9) 246 (51.9)
 Frequent urination 18 (9.6) 43 (15.0) 61 (12.9)
 Other 9 (4.8) 21 (7.3) 30 (6.3)
Top 6 reasons given for PPH developing
 Ate more fat/sugar than estimated 55 (29.4) 93 (32.4) 148 (31.2)
 Ate more than calculated bolus dose for 56 (29.9) 88 (30.7) 144 (30.4)
 Forgot to take bolus dose 30 (16.0) 53 (18.5) 83 (17.5)
 Calculated bolus dose incorrectly 37 (19.8) 42 (14.6) 79 (16.7)
 Took too little bolus insulin* 36 (19.3) 36 (12.5) 72 (15.2)
 Because of stress 19 (10.2) 39 (13.6) 58 (12.2)
Top 5 situations/factors contributing to PPH
 Stress** 36 (19.3) 94 (32.8) 130 (27.4)
 Eating at a restaurant 43 (23.0) 75 (26.1) 118 (24.9)
 Being busy 34 (18.2) 66 (23.0) 100 (21.1)
 Feeling tired** 24 (12.8) 67 (23.3) 91 (19.2)
 I do not know* 37 (19.8) 34 (11.8) 71 (15.0)
Corrective action taken following PPH
 Tested BG and took bolus based on reading*** 134 (71.7) 160 (55.7) 294 (62.0)
 Ate less/more carefully next meal/snack** 22 (11.8) 67 (23.3) 89 (18.8)
 Waited, took bolus dose next time I ate 17 (9.1) 40 (13.9) 57 (12.0)
 Took bolus dose without testing BG 17 (9.1) 39 (13.6) 56 (11.8)
 Skipped next meal/snack 8 (4.3) 14 (4.9) 22 (4.6)
 Other 6 (3.2) 15 (5.2) 21 (4.4)
 Total took bolus dose** 147 (78.6) 191 (66.6) 338 (71.3)

Chi-square tests indicate significant differences by diabetes type, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001

PPH post-prandial hyperglycemia, BG blood glucose

aResponses not mutually exclusive