Table 5. Comparison of PDNAsite with other existing methods on PDNA-62 by five-fold cross-validation^a.

Methods	ACC (%)	MCC	SN (%)	SP (%)	ST (%)	AUC
Dps-pred	79.10	–	40.30	81.80	61.10	–
Dbs-pssm	66.40	–	68.20	66.00	67.10	–
BindN	70.30	–	69.40	70.50	69.95	0.752
Dp-bind	78.10	0.4900	79.20	77.20	78.20	–
DP-Bind	77.20	–	76.40	76.60	76.50	–
BindN-RF	78.20	–	78.10	78.20	78.15	0.861
BindN+	79.00	0.440	77.30	79.30	78.30	0.859
PreDNA	83.06	0.500	80.20	84.10	82.20	–
PDNAsite	85.11	0.582	86.27	84.91	85.59	0.928

^aThe results of Dps-pred¹⁵, Dbs-pssm²⁹, BindN¹², Dp-bind²¹, Dp-Bind⁴¹, BindN-RF¹⁴, BindN+¹⁷ and PreDNA²⁴ and PDNAsite using both the sequence and the spatial context and applying LSA on the sub feature space spanned by the PSSM features.