Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 5;23(3):496–507. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv175

Table 5.

Exploratory Analysis

Profile element Bivariable analyses Multivariable analysis
RR (95% CI), P-value RR (95% CI), P-value
Low likelihood of mentee contacting mentor (rating = 1 or 2) (N = 17)
Health interests 1.02 (0.78-1.34), P = .88 1.11 (0.94-1.20), P = .63
Language style 0.86 (0.72-1.03), P = .09 0.88 (0.71-1.11), P = .29
Demographics 1.04 (0.83-1.30), P = .74 1.03 (0.88-1.22), P = .70
Sample posts 1.11 (0.74-1.65), P = .62 2.06 (1.44-2.96), P < .001
High likelihood of mentee contacting mentor (rating = 8 or 9) (N = 17)
Health interests 0.93 (0.79-1.11), P = .43 0.93 (0.83-1.04), P = .22
Language style 0.99 (0.84-1.16), P = .87 1.10 (0.98-1.24), P = .11
Demographics 0.95 (0.85-1.06), P = .35 0.96 (0.87-1.05), P = .35
Sample posts 4.02 (1.59-10.2), P = .003 4.04 (1.96-8.31), P < .001

CI, confidence interval; N, number of profiles rated; RR, relative risk of “low” or “high” mentor contact rating. Cells are bolded that show significance at 0.05 level or better.