Skip to main content
. 2016 May 10;31(7):1425–1435. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew105

Table V.

The performance of (i) M4 triage, (ii) triage based on hCG ratio cut-offs (low risk if hCG ratio <0.87 or >1.66) and (iii) triage based on a single progesterone cut-off (low risk if progesterone ≤10 nmol/l).

PUL classified as low risk NPV Sensitivity FPR
Using all data (n = 835)
 M4 decision 70% (67 to 73) 97% (95 to 98) 82% (73 to 88) 23% (20 to 27)
 hCG ratio cut-offs 81% (78 to 83) 96% (94 to 97) 68% (58 to 77) 13% (11 to 15)
 Difference −11% (−13 to −9) nc 14% (7 to 21) 10% (8 to 13)
Using QCCH and HH patients with progesterone levels (n = 560)
 M4 decision 68% (64 to 72) 97% (94 to 98) 82% (72 to 89) 25% (21 to 29)
 Progesterone cut-off 47% (43 to 51) 91% (87 to 94) 68% (57 to 78) 51% (46 to 55)
 Difference 21% (16 to 26) nc 14% (−1 to 28) −26% (−31 to −21)

95% confidence intervals are shown in parentheses.

NPV, negative predictive value; FPR, false positive rate; QCCH, Queen Charlottes' & Chelsea Hospital; HH, Hillingdon Hospital; nc, not computed.