Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2015 Jun 30;80(4):738–763. doi: 10.1177/0003122415592129

Table 3.

Effects of Family Structure Transitions on Cognitive Achievement

REM w/o TV REM w/TV FEM MSM

(1) (2) (3) (4)
A. Number of Family Structure Transitions
 0 (ref.)
 1 −.013 (.024) −.007 (.024) .010 (.028) −.014 (.025)
 2+ −.063* (.034) −.062* (.035) −.018 (.039) −.058 (.039)
B. Type of Family Structure Transitions
 Stable coresidential union (ref.)
 Move out −.064* (.034) −.068** (.034) −.067 (.042) −.076** (.036)
 Multiple transitions from coresidential union −.105** (.049) −.102** (.049) −.050 (.057) −.114** (.058)
 Stable single motherhood (ref.)
 Move in .040 (.034) .047 (.034) .078* (.041) .000 (.037)
 Multiple transitions from single motherhood −.022 (.048) −.028 (.048) .009 (.055) −.044 (.050)

Note: N = 6,525 person-years. Robust standard errors are in parentheses. All models include survey year, its square term, child’s age, and its square term. REM and MSM also control for observed time-constant covariates.

TV = time-varying covariates.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001 (one-tailed tests).