Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2015 Jun 30;80(4):738–763. doi: 10.1177/0003122415592129

Table 5.

Effects of Family Structure Transitions on Internalizing Behavior

REM w/o TV REM w/TV FEM MSM
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A. Number of Family Structure Transitions
 0 (ref.)
 1 .058** (.025) .059** (.025) .061** (.029) .049* (.027)
 2+ .019 (.037) .019 (.037) .020 (.042) .011 (.043)
B. Type of Family Structure Transitions
 Stable coresidential union (ref.)
 Move out .070** (.035) .065* (.035) .067 (.044) .052 (.036)
 Multiple transitions from coresidential union .098* (.053) .093* (.053) .098 (.061) .102 (.065)
 Stable single motherhood (ref.)
 Move in .049 (.036) .049 (.037) .056 (.044) .038 (.040)
 Multiple transitions from single motherhood −.052 (.051) −.049 (.051) −.048 (.058) −.087* (.052)

Note: N = 7,946 person-years. Robust standard errors are in parentheses. All models include survey year, its square term, child’s age, and its square term. REM and MSM also control for observed time-constant covariates.

TV = time-varying covariates.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001 (one-tailed tests).