Skip to main content
. 2016 Summer;4(3):116–126.

Table 1.

Charecteristics of included studies

Study No. of patient
(+ / -) 1
Age 2 (years) Male (%) Reference / Index Transducer / Operator Sampling Weaknesses
Ma 1997 ( 27 ) 26 / 214 NR NR CT / US, CXR 3.5-to 2.5-MHz / EP Consecutive Retrospective design
Abboud 2003 ( 28 ) 14 / 126 38 (5–89) NR CT / US 3.75 MHz /
EP
Convenience Time interval between US and CT scan was varied; Blinding was not performed
Brooks 2004 ( 18 ) 12 / 49 NR NR CT / US 4- to 2-MHz /
EP
Convenience Small sample size; Possibility of selection bias
Traub 2007 ( 31 ) 16 / 125 47 (18-89) 75 CT / CXR NA /
Radiologist
Convenience Retrospective design
Possibility of selection bias
Hyacinthe 2012 ( 19 ) 35 / 202 39 (22-51) 82 CT / US 5- to 2-MHz /
EP
Consecutive Possibility of selection bias
Poveda 2012 ( 32 ) 47 / 21 39 (16-70) 89.7 Surgery / US 3.75 MHZ /
Radiologist
Convenience Possibility of selection bias
Błasińska 2013 ( 33 ) 24 / 36 NR NR CT / CXR NA /
Radiologist
Consecutive Low sample size
Uz 2013 ( 34 ) 21 / 86 37 (19.8) 80.4 CT/ US 10-to 5-MHz / Radiologist Consecutive Low sample size
Chardoli 2013 ( 35 ) 14 / 186 38 (16-90) 84 CT / CXR NA /
EP
Convenience The interpretation of the CXR and CT were not in blind fashion
Possible selection bias
Leblanc 2014 ( 36 ) 19 / 26 36 (15-56) 71 CT/ US, CXR 5-to 1-MHz /
Intensivist
Convenience Low sample size
Possibility of selection bias
Langdorf 2015 ( 37 ) 230 / 5682 ≥ 15 57.4 CT/ CXR NA /
Radiologist
Convenience Possibility of selection bias
Variation in timing of CT and CXR
Vafaei 2015 ( 38 ) 29 / 123 31 (4-67) 77.6 CT / US, CXR 3.5-to 7-MHz / EP Convenience Possibility of selection bias

1, (+ / -): Number of patient with hemothorax / number of patient without hemothorax; 2, Number are presented as mean ± standard deviation or (range). CT: Computed tomography; CXR: Chest radiography; EP: Emergency physician; NA: Not applicable; NR: Not Reported; US: Ultrasonography