Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 10;11(6):e0157238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157238

Table 3. Significant Indirect Mediation Analysis of Neuroticism, PSQI, and CES-D.

Model β p
Hypothesized model
N → Sleep latency → Depressive symptoms N → Sleep latency 0.04 .000
Sleep latency → Depressive symptoms 2.45 .006
N → Depressive symptoms 0.58 .000
N → Sleep disturbance → Depressive symptoms N → Sleep disturbance 0.02 .001
Sleep disturbance → Depressive symptoms 2.97 .029
N → Depressive symptoms 0.63 .000
N → Sleep quality → Depressive symptoms N → Sleep quality 0.03 .006
Sleep quality → Depressive symptoms 2.63 .002
N → Depressive symptoms 0.62 .000
N → Global PSQI → Depressive symptoms N → Global PSQI 0.15 .006
Global PSQI → Depressive symptoms 0.77 .000
N → Depressive symptoms 0.57 .000
Alternative Model
N → Depressive symptoms → Sleep latency N → Depressive symptoms 0.69 .000
Depressive symptoms → Sleep latency 0.03 .006
N → Sleep latency 0.03 .022
N → Depressive symptoms → Sleep disturbance N → Depressive symptoms 0.69 .000
Depressive symptoms →→ Sleep disturbance 0.02 .029
N → Sleep disturbance 0.01 .225
N → Depressive symptoms → Sleep quality N → Depressive symptoms 0.69 .000
Depressive symptoms → Sleep quality 0.03 .002
N → Sleep quality 0.003 .758
N → Depressive symptoms → Global PSQI N → Depressive symptoms 0.69 .000
Depressive symptoms → Global PSQI 0.15 .000
N → Global PSQI 0.05 .250

Notes. Mediation analyses were conducted on PROCESS macro, adjusting for age, gender and medication. N = neuroticism; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; CES-D = Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale.