Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2016 May 8;92-93:478–485. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.035

Table 4.

Parameter estimates for models predicting ABR Wave V and CCT from vinclozolin and diethyltoluamide concentrations

Non-masker 8ms masker 16ms masker 64ms masker
Wave V CCT Wave V CCT Wave V CCT Wave V CCT
N = 27 N = 27 N = 20 N = 19 N = 21 N = 21 N = 27 N =26
Vinclozolin
(ng/mL)		 0.14 (−
0.01 –
0.28)† 		0.12 (−
0.03 –
0.28)		 0.20
(0.05 –
0.36)* 		0.18
(0.01 –
0.35)* 		0.14 (−
0.07 –
0.36)		 0.12 (−
0.10 –
0.35)		 0.10 (−
0.08 –
0.29)		 0.15
(0.00 –
0.30)†
Diethyltoluamide
(ng/mL)		 0.23 (−
0.01 –
0.48)† 		0.24 (−
0.02 –
0.49)† 		0.24
(0.00 –
0.48)† 		0.21 (−
0.05 –
0.48)		 0.35
(0.04 –
0.67)* 		0.42
(0.11 –
0.73)** 		0.34
(0.04 –
0.63)* 		0.26
(0.01 –
0.51)*
**

p < 0.01,

*

p < 0.05,

†

p < 0.10

N’s vary based on availability of useable ABR data.