Table 4.
Model-estimated food preference values over time among all participants.
| High fat/high sugar, M (SE) |
p- valuea |
High fat/high complex carbohydrate, M (SE) |
p-value | Absolute Congruency Preference-low fat diet, M (SE) |
p- value |
Absolute Congruency Preference-low carbohydrate diet, M (SE) |
p- valuea |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-fat diet (n=93) | ||||||||
| Week 0 | 6.09 (0.18) | 5.79 (0.15) | 6.04 (0.14) | 6.57 (0.11) | ||||
| Week 12 | 5.67 (0.20) | .01 | 5.11 (0.18) | <.0001 | 5.79 (0.16) | .08 | 6.20 (0.13) | .003 |
| Week 24 | 5.59 (0.21) | .001 | 4.96 (0.17) | <.0001 | 5.65 (0.16) | .002 | 6.11 (0.14) | <.0001 |
| Week 36 | 5.52 (0.21) | .003 | 4.93 (0.17) | <.0001 | 5.71 (0.16) | .02 | 6.24 (0.13) | .004 |
| Week 48 | 5.59 (0.20) | .006 | 4.96 (0.17) | <.0001 | 5.74 (0.15) | .02 | 6.18 (0.13) | .0007 |
| Low-carbohydrate diet (n=112) | ||||||||
| Week 0 | 6.30 (0.14) | 6.08 (0.12) | 6.07 (0.10) | 6.74 (0.10 | ||||
| Week 12 | 5.90 (0.17) | .004 | 5.43 (0.15) | <.0001 | 5.61 (0.12) | <.0001 | 6.66 (0.10) | .30 |
| Week 24 | 5.53 (0.18) | <.0001 | 5.11 (0.16) | <.0001 | 5.42 (0.11) | <.0001 | 6.64 (0.11) | .26 |
| Week 36 | 5.46 (0.19) | <.0001 | 4.98 (0.16) | <.0001 | 5.41 (0.12) | <.0001 | 6.64 (0.11) | .28 |
| Week 48 | 5.48 (0.19) | <.0001 | 5.07 (0.16) | <.0001 | 5.44 (0.11) | <.0001 | 6.62 (0.10) | .23 |
Notes. Values are among all study participants (Choice and No Choice) with available study data.
a
p-value is for comparison of week 0 to subsequent week.