Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 30;26:2118–2125. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4062-z

Table 4.

Diagnostic performance (on a per-scan basis) for T2-weighted MRI only versus T2-weighted MRI + DWI combined for diagnosing local tumor regrowth after chemoradiotherapy followed by organ-saving treatment

T2W T2W + DWI
R1 R2 R1 R2
Sensitivity (%) 58 (29–84) [7/12] 58 (29–84) [7/12] 75 (43–93) [9/12] 75 (43–93) [9/12]
Specificity (%) 98 (96–99) [418/428] 100 (99–100) [428/428] 97 (99–100) [414/428] 100 (98–100) [426/428]
PPV (%) 41 (19–67) [7/17] 100 (56–100) [7/7] 39 (20–61) [9/23] 82 (48–79) [9/11]
NPV (%) 99 (97–100) [418/423] 98 (97–99) [428/433] 99 (98–100) [414/417] 99 (98–100) [426/429]
Accuracy (%) 97 (94–98) [425/440] 99 (97–100) [435/440] 96 (94–98) [423/440] 99 (97–100) [435/440]
No. of equivocal scores (confidence level 2) 5 [22/440] 9 [40/440] 2 [7/440] 5 [20/440]

Note: Numbers in parentheses are 95 % confidence intervals; numbers in brackets are raw data

R1 reader 1, R2 reader 2, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value