Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 12;71(4):591–601. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu184

Table 1.

Linear Regressions Predicting Memory

Variables Cross-sectional associations (βs) Longitudinal associations (βs)
Memory performance Self-rated memory Memory performance Self-rated memory
M1 M2 M3 d M1 M2 M3 d M1 M2 M3 d M1 M2 M3 d
Demographics
 Age −.33* −.33* −.32* −.12* −.12* −.12* −.24* −.24* −.24* −.01 −.02 −.02
 Age squared −.09* −.08* −.09* .05* .07* .06* −06* −.06* −.07* .00 .00 .00
 Sex .16* .16* .16* .02 .02* .03* .08* .09* .09* .02 .03* .03*
 Ethnicity (black) −.14* −.14* −14* −.06* −.08* −.08* −.05* −.05* −.05* −.03* −.04* −.04*
 Ethnicity (other) −.06* −.06* −.06* −.02* −.03* −.03* −.01 −.01 −.01 −.01 −.01 −.01
 Education .29* .26* .26* .22* .16* .15* .15* .14* .13* .09* .06* .06*
Baseline performance .44* .43* .43* .53* .49* .49*
Personality
 Neuroticism −.06* −05* .23 −09* −.07* .43 −.03* −.02* .08 −.06* −.05* .22
 Extraversion −.02 −03* .12 .10* .09* .45 −.02 −.03* .01 .04* .03* .18
 Openness .05* .05* .21 .10* .11* .51 .02* .03* .07 .06* .06* .19
 Agreeableness .01 .01 .13 −07* −.06* .27 −.02 −.02 .03 −.04* −.04* .09
 Conscientiousness .06* .06* .27 .13* .12* .60 .03* .03* .10 .05* .04* .22
Health-risk factors
 Hypertension −.02* .06 −.02 .10 −.00 .02 −.01 .05
 Diabetes −.03* .09 −.00 .08 −.04* .09 −.01 .05
 Treatment for distress −.03* .15 −.08* .32 −.02* .08 −.02* .12
 Obesity .02* .03 .01 .03 .01 .00 .00 .02
 Physical inactivity −.03* .12 −.03* .18 −.01 .04 −.02* .09
 Ever smoker .00 .02 −.03* .10 .00 .01 −.02 .04
R 2 adjusted .292 .305 .309 .077 .146 .153 .429 .431 .433 .316 .329 .331
R 2 change .292* .014* .004* .078* .069* .008* .429* .003* .002* .316* .014* .002*
Sample size N = 13,140 N = 13,140 N = 10,565 N = 10,592

Notes: βs = standardized regression coefficients; d = Cohen’s d (absolute values), computed by comparing top and bottom quartiles of each personality trait and the absence/presence of each risk factor, controlling for the demographic covariates. A total of 13,987 participants had at least one valid measure of personality and memory at baseline. Given that not all participants completed both measures at follow-up, N ranged from 10,565 to 10,592 for longitudinal analysis. The effects were similar when the HRS sampling weights were used in the analyses. M1 = Model 1, which included the demographic factors as predictors on cognition. M2 = Model 2, which additionally included personality. M3 = Model 3, which additionally included the health-risk factors. Health-risk factors were coded 0/1 (i.e., absence/presence, respectively).

*p < .01.