Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 27;42(4):1027–1036. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv180

Table 1.

Sample Demographics Summary

Demographic CAMH (n = 96) ZHH (n = 99) PNC (n = 370) Diff. (p)* Combined (n = 565)
Cortical thickness analysis
 Age, mean (y) (SD) 46 (18.8) 33 (16) 15 (3.6) <.0001 23 (16.4)
 Sex 50M, 46 F 53M, 47 F 178M, 193 F .58 281M, 286 F
 Handedness 89 R, 7 L 89R, 10 L 328 R, 42 L .57 506 R, 59 L
 IQ, mean score (SD)a 118 (8.5)b 106 (9.6)c 106 (13.2)d
CAMH (n = 93) ZHH (n = 99) PNC (n = 338) Diff. (p)* Combined (n = 530)
Fractional anisotropy analysis
 Age, mean (y) (SD) 46 (18.7) 32 (16) 15 (3.5) <.0001 23 (16.4)
 Sex 48M, 45 F 52M, 47 F 164M, 178 F .66 264M, 270 F
 Handedness 87 R, 6 L 88R, 10L, 1 NA 303 R, 38L, 1 NA .44 478 R, 54L, 2 NA
 IQ, mean score (SD)a 118 (8.5)e 106 (9.6)f 107 (13.2)g

Note: CAMH, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; IQ, Intelligence Quotient; NA, data not available; PNC, Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort; ZHH, Zucker Hillside Hospital. R, right handed; L, left handed; M, male; F, female.

aIQ was evaluated using different tests in each sample subset; for CAMH sample, the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR); for ZHH, the Wide-Range Achievement Test v3 (WRAT-3); and for PNC, the Wide-Range Achievement Test v4 (WRAT-4). Therefore, no cross-sample or combined-sample statistical comparison of IQ score was performed.

IQ data were only available for a subset of each sample: b n = 85, c n = 88, d n = 370, e n = 84, f n = 87, g n = 337.

*p values for sample differences are 2 sided and were calculated using ANOVA for continuous data (age) and Fisher’s Exact Test for factor data (sex, handedness).