Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Disabil Health J. 2016 Mar 24;9(3):498–509. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.02.003

Table 5.

Colorectal cancer screening rates by disability type among men aged 50–75 years with no colorectal cancer history

Disability type Year
1998 2000 2003 2005 2008 2010
Percent (standard error)a,b
All men 31.4 (0.9) 31.3 (0.8) 39.8 (0.9) 43.3 (0.9) 51.0 (1.1) 58.4 (0.9)
No disability 30.9 (1.1) 29.1 (1.0) 38.9 (1.1) 41.8 (1.0) 50.6 (1.3) 58.8 (1.2)
Basic action difficulties (BAD)c
 Movement difficulty 33.2 (1.6) 39.4 (1.9)* 43.0 (2.0) 48.9 (1.8)+ 54.3 (2.0) 59.3 (1.7)
  Least severe 29.1 (3.2) 43.6 (3.5)* 46.7 (3.7)# 47.2 (3.5) 56.3 (4.1) 60.5 (3.0)
  Level 2 40.6 (3.9)# 37.1 (3.3)# 40.8 (3.5) 49.7 (3.3)# 61.9 (4.2)§ 61.6 (3.6)
  Level 3 33.3 (3.7) 36.9 (3.4)# 44.6 (3.9) 48.8 (3.9) 55.5 (4.1) 57.9 (3.5)
  Level 4 28.1 (4.0) 39.1 (4.7)# 38.1 (4.7) 51.3 (4.9) 45.0 (5.8) 50.9 (4.3)
  Most severe 34.3 (4.6) 41.5 (6.2)# 37.7 (5.4) 51.3 (5.8) 38.8 (5.8)# 69.4 (5.2)#
 Sensory difficulty 34.0 (2.6) 40.5 (2.9)+ 44.4 (3.1) 51.8 (2.9)+ 46.5 (3.3) 62.0 (2.7)
 Emotional difficulty 29.5 (5.6) 46.3 (5.7)§ 31.6 (5.9) 46.1 (6.0) 46.0 (6.3) 55.3 (5.2)
 Cognitive difficulty 34.9 (5.7) 40.0 (6.2) 38.8 (4.5) 46.3 (5.2) 59.2 (5.5) 59.8 (4.1)
 Any BAD 33.1 (1.5) 38.8 (1.8)* 42.7 (1.9) 48.8 (1.7)+ 54.0 (2.0) 59.7 (1.6)
Complex action limitations (CAL)c
 Self-care limitation 37.4 (4.6) 42.6 (4.8)§ 39.5 (4.8) 44.0 (4.3) 44.1 (4.3) 57.5 (4.1)
 Social limitation 33.2 (3.0) 38.3 (3.1)§ 39.3 (3.3) 51.4 (3.2)§ 45.9 (3.7) 56.3 (3.1)
 Work limitation 36.2 (2.3)# 36.9 (2.4)§ 42.9 (2.6) 48.9 (2.3)§ 51.9 (2.6) 58.6 (2.2)
 Any CAL 35.8 (2.2)# 36.3 (2.2)§ 42.5 (2.5) 48.2 (2.1)§ 51.3 (2.4) 58.5 (2.2)
Any disability 33.8 (1.5) 38.0 (1.7)* 42.8 (1.9) 47.8 (1.6)§ 53.8 (1.9) 59.4 (1.6)
a

Percent adjusted by age distribution from the 2010 US Census.

b

p-values for comparison with men without disability

*

p ≤ 0.0001

+

p ≤ 0.001

§

p ≤ 0.01

#

p ≤ 0.05.

c

Screening rates changed significantly for all disability groups (p ≤ 0.01). There was a statistically significant trend over time in the differences in screening rates between men with no disability and men within the following disability groups: movement difficulty (p ≤ 0.01); least severe movement difficulty (p = 0.03); movement difficulty severity level 4 (p = 0.02); most severe movement difficulty (p = 0.04); sensory difficulty (p ≤ 0.01); emotional difficulty (p = 0.02); any BAD (p = 0.01); social limitation (p ≤ 0.01); and any disability (p = 0.04).