Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Disabil Health J. 2016 Mar 24;9(3):498–509. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.02.003

Table 6.

Adjusted odds of reporting colorectal cancer screening in 2010 accounting for sociodemographic factors and disability status among women with a disability: adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval), p valuesa

Variables Models
Movement Sensory Emotional Cognitive Self-care Social Work
NHIS sample: n 4, 324 4, 323 4, 311 4, 178 4, 272 4, 189 4, 272
Sociodemographic
 Age category (p-values) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  50–64 years 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  65–75 years 1.4 (1.2, 1.7) 1.4 (1.2, 1.7) 1.4 (1.2, 1.6) 1.4 (1.2, 1.7) 1.4 (1.2, 1.7) 1.4 (1.2, 1.7) 1.4 (1.2, 1.7)
 Race (p-values) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  White 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  Black 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3)
  Asian 0.5 (0.3, 0.7) 0.5 (0.3, 0.6) 0.5 (0.3, 0.6) 0.5 (0.3, 0.6) 0.5 (0.3, 0.6) 0.5 (0.3, 0.6) 0.5 (0.3, 0.6)
  Other, multiple races 1.1 (0.7, 1.8) 1.1 (0.7, 1.8) 1.1 (0.6, 1.8) 1.2 (0.7, 2.0) 1.1 (0.7, 1.8) 1.2 (0.7, 2.0) 1.1 (0.7, 1.8)
 Hispanic ethnicity (p-values) 0.9236 0.8857 0.8792 0.6728 0.7498 0.6126 0.7546
  Yes 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3)
  No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Education (p-values) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  Less than high school 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  High school 1.2 (1.0, 1.6) 1.2 (1.0, 1.5) 1.2 (1.0, 1.5) 1.2 (0.9, 1.5) 1.2 (1.0, 1.5) 1.2 (0.9, 1.5) 1.2 (1.0, 1.5)
  Some college/associates degree 1.6 (1.3, 2.1) 1.6 (1.3, 2.0) 1.6 (1.3, 2.1) 1.5 (1.2, 2.0) 1.6 (1.3, 2.1) 1.6 (1.2, 2.0) 1.6 (1.3, 2.1)
  College and advanced degrees 1.8 (1.4, 2.3) 1.8 (1.4, 2.3) 1.8 (1.4, 2.3) 1.8 (1.4, 2.3) 1.8 (1.4, 2.3) 1.8 (1.4, 2.3) 1.8 (1.4, 2.3)
 Income less than poverty threshold (p-values) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  Yes 0.5 (0.4, 0.7) 0.5 (0.4, 0.7) 0.5 (0.4, 0.7) 0.5 (0.4, 0.6) 0.5 (0.4, 0.7) 0.5 (0.4, 0.6) 0.5 (0.4, 0.7)
  No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Health insurance (p-values) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  Yes 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  No 0.3 (0.3, 0.5) 0.3 (0.3, 0.5) 0.3 (0.3, 0.5) 0.3 (0.3, 0.5) 0.4 (0.3, 0.5) 0.3 (0.3, 0.5) 0.4 (0.3, 0.5)
 Has usual source of care (p-values) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  Yes 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  No 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) 0.4 (0.2, 0.5) 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) 0.4 (0.2, 0.5) 0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
Basic action difficulties (BAD)
 Severity of movement difficulty (p-values) 0.1035
  Least severe 1.5 (0.9, 2.7)
  Level two 1.7 (1.0, 3.0)
  Level three 1.2 (0.7, 2.1)
  Level four 1.9 (1.0, 3.5)
  Most severe 1.7 (0.9, 3.1)
  No 1.0
 Sensory difficulty (p-values) 0.7538
  Yes 1.0 (0.8, 1.4)
  No 1.0
 Emotional difficulty (p-values) 0.4990
  Yes 0.9 (0.6, 1.3)
  No 1.0
 Cognitive difficulty (p-values) 0.9741
  Yes 1.0 (0.7, 1.5)
  No 1.0
 Any BAD 0.2248 0.3393 0.2193 0.3228
  Yes 0.7 (0.4, 1.2) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3)
  No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Complex action limitations (CAL)
 Self-care limitation (p-values) 0.8875
  Yes 1.0 (0.7, 1.5)
  No 1.0
 Social limitation (p-values) 0.0183
  Yes 0.6 (0.5, 0.9)
  No 1.0
 Work limitation (p-values) 0.8839
  Yes 1.0 (0.7, 1.4)
  No 1.0
 Any CAL 0.2446 0.0088 0.3841
  Yes 1.1 (0.9, 1.4) 1.5 (1.1, 2.1) 1.2 (0.8, 1.7)
  No 1.0 1.0 1.0
a

Analysis account for the complex NHIS sampling design.