Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 13;6:143. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00143

Table 2.

Imaging and explant characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

All patients with HCC (n = 63) TACE (n = 18) Ablation
Imaging prior to bridging therapy
Imaging type MRI 37 (86.0%) 15 (83.3%) 21 (84.0%) p = 0.823
CT 4 (9.3%) 2 (11.1%) 2 (8.0%)
Number tumors median 1.5 1 1 p = 0.014
Largest tumor dimension median (cm) 2.7 2.9 2.3 p = 0.149
Imaging after bridging therapy
Imaging type MRI 37 (86.0%) 13 (76.5%) 23 (95.8%) p = 0.134
CT 1 (2.3%) 1 (5.9%) 0 (0.0%)
Post-bridge imaging with HCC Yes 9 (23.7%) 6 (40.0%) 3 (13.0%) p = 0.104
No 29 (67.4%) 9 (60.0%) 20 (87.0%)
Explant – patients grouped on first bridging procedure
Viable tumor on explant Yes 50 (79.4%) 11 (61.1%) 21 (84.0%) p = 0.069
No 13 (20.6%) 7 (38.9%) 4 (16.0%)
Number of tumors on explant pathology 0 3 (4.8%) 1 (5.6%) 1 (4.0%) p = 0.642
1 32 (50.8%) 6 (33.3%) 15 (60.0%)
2 13 (20.6%) 6 (33.3%) 5 (40.0%)
3 13 (20.6%) 4 (22.2%) 3 (12.0%)
4 2 (3.2%) 1 (5.6%) 1 (4.0%)
Explant tumor necrosis Yes 39 (62.9%) 12 (66.7%) 20 (80.0%) p = 0.482
No 23 (37.1%) 6 (33.3%) 5 (20.0%)
Explant tumor necrosis, mean (SD) 34.39% 41.20% 47.00% p = 0.787
Explant pathology T-stage TO 3 (4.8%) 2 (11.1%) 1 (4.0%) p = 0.198
T1 27 (42.9%) 4 (22.2%) 13 (52.0%)
T2 23 (36.5%) 8 (44.4%) 6 (24.0%)
T3a 2 (3.2%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (8.0%)
None 8 (12.7%) 4 (22.2%) 3 (12.0%)
Tumor grade 1 12 (24.5%) 2 (20.0%) 1 (4.8%) p = 0.346
2 26 (53.1%) 6 (60.0%) 13 (61.9%)
3 9 (18.4%) 2 (20.0%) 5 (23.8%)
Explant largest tumor diameter in cm, mean (SD) 2.8 2.4 3.8 p = 0.141