Table 2.
Availability and caseload of pain treatment facilities.
| Author(s) (year) | Pain facility per population | New consultation appointments per facility per month | Follow-up appointments per facility per month | Appointments per facility per month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | ||||
| Hogg et al. (2012) [20] | 1 per 310,000 people | Range = 24.92–36.75a | — | — |
| Canada | ||||
| Peng et al. (2007) [21] | — | Mdn = 2.58a | Mdn = 37.50a | — |
| Peng et al. (2007) [18] | 1 per 258,000 people | M = 37.58ab | M = 432.19ab | — |
| Veillette et al. (2005) [22] | — | M = 16b | M = 74b | — |
| Italy | ||||
| De Benedittis and Lorenzetti (1989) [23] | — | — | — | M = 164.58a |
| United Kingdom | ||||
| Clinical Standards Advisory Group (2000) [25] | — | Average = 35 | Average = 21 | — |
| Dr. Foster & the Pain Society (2003) [26] | — | — | — | Range = 15–750a |
| National Pain Audit (2011) [27] | Range = 0.27–0.50 per 100,000 people | — | — | — |
| United States | ||||
| Castel et al. (2009) [29] | — | — | — | M = 1244.10c, Mdn = 709.05c |
| Hickling et al. (1985) [31] | — | M = 36.1 | M = 74.3 | — |
Note. Information on incidence and caseload was not available for Bisset [24], Csordas and Clark [30], National Pain Audit [28], and Peng et al. [17].
aDivided by 12 to provide a monthly estimate since annual appointments were reported in source paper.
bDivided by the number of pain treatment services surveyed since the total number of appointments was reported in the source paper.
cMultiplied by 4.35 to provide a monthly estimate since weekly appointments were reported in source paper.