Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 31;2016:2157950. doi: 10.1155/2016/2157950

Table 8.

Predictors of positive analgesic outcomes.

Variable 30% ESAS pain 50% ESAS pain 30% BPI worst pain 50% BPI worst pain
OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
Sex (male versus female) 6.4 1.7, 23.6 0.005 3.7 1.3, 10.6 0.015 3.5 1.1, 10.9 0.030
NSAIDs initiated in clinic (yes versus no) 5.2 0.8, 33.9 0.086 4.7 0.8, 29.5 0.095
Methadone use at baseline (yes versus no) 0.1 0.01, 1.4 0.093
Opioid use at baseline (yes versus no) 4.8 1.1, 21.7 0.039
Radiotherapy use in clinic (yes versus no) 0.1 0.02, 0.9 0.035

Final multivariate model after variable selection using p In = 0.05 and p Out = 0.100. Variables considered in the model were those showing a p value of <0.150 in univariate logistic regression. Potential predictors tested were gender (male versus female), age, site of primary tumour, disease type (localized versus advanced), BPI worst pain at baseline, separate use of analgesics (acetaminophen, NSAID, steroids, antiepileptic, antidepressants, antipsychotics, sedatives, cannabinoids, opioids, or methadone), and indication of nondrug analgesic interventions (radiotherapy, psychotherapy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and interventional therapy) during the course of treatment.

No independent predictors were identified for 50% improvement in BPI worst pain.

Statistically significant variables are highlighted in italics.